Home | TRUCKERS REPRESENT NINETY-NINE PERCENTERS | FEMA/KATRINA COMPLAINT | About CRA | Truckers Complaint | Justice for Blacks | Driving While Black | Banking While Black | UEDCRABANK | UAAD BWB | UEDC/CRA PROPOSAL | Chase Bank Reparation #2 | Chase Bank & Slavery | Chase Smart Start LA | AmSRegionsCRA | Chase Affinity Proposal | The Feds Regulate and Collabrate With Banks | UAAD Complaint to FDIC | UAAD Complaint | | UAAD-HBCU CRA | The FEMA Story | UAAD Katrina Recovery | Black News / JP Morgan's Slave Ties | NAACP Bank Rating | UAAD - Coalition Partners | UAAD CRA HBUC | Louisiana Asso. of Nonprofit Organizations | NAACP | Recycling Black Dollars | SCLC | UEDC/CRA PROPOSAL | UAAD Mission | Principals | Contact Us | Membership Form | Policy Link | FAQ and Links


To: Writer Richard K. De Atley,

There is extreme discrimination and disparity in the Riverside county Judicial system.  It would be a public service to the community of Riverside county to expose the disparity that exist.  Every new judge appointed, elected in this County should be African American until the amount of judges reflect the community they serve. Only when the entire judicial system to include Police Officers, the DA's Office, Public Defenders Office reflect the entire community to include African Americans will we begin to achieve equal justice for all.
 May 6, 2012  Why Riverside County need African American Black Judges, not just any old Negro  “No one investigate when African Americans are the victims”.WHY WE NEED A FAIR JUDICIAL SYSTEM

Our need for a fair judicial system is due to the decisions of Judges such as Judge Chris Willmon, State of California Workman Compensation Appeal Court. This is a Court manned by so called AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, most Caucasian females, no African Americans, and does not meet the requirements of the Civil Rights Legislation of 1964.Decisions rendered by this court are biased, discriminatory and most time unfair, Especially when African Americans are the victims, see:

 Quote by Forensic Anthropologist Clyde C. Snow Regarding Abuse of Police Powers:
Of all the forms of murder, none is more monstrous than that committed by a state against its own citizens. And of all murder victims, those of the state are the most helpless and vulnerable since the very entity to which they have entrusted their lives and safety becomes their killer. Thus, it is especially important that states be called to account for their deeds .see:   The above quote should apply throughout the judicial system. An African American Judge might begin a process to end: SELECTIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT
Selective Law enforcement is not new. When the police forces of eastern metropoli were predominately German in ethnicity, Irish immigrants were disproportionately the targets of a patrolman’s nightstick. When the Irish copper became the “keeper of the peace”, the later arriving Italian experienced a rousting the Irish expertly administered, being well taught by those who had harassed them earlier. An organized civil response to such activities is not new either. Any number of protests often organized under the auspices of the church or fraternal organizations, decried the excesses of police activity in their respective communities.
Then and now, official police policy prohibited the targeting of persons based upon their ethnicity alone. This was and is so; first and foremost, because effective police and criminal investigative work cannot be predicated upon stereotyping and subjective, non-fact based assumptions. Nevertheless, it was certainly not uncommon for police personnel to speculate that criminal behavior was more likely found among people whose native language, culture and geographic point of origin ware different from their own. So why is it so difficult for people now to believe that such occurs with regularity today?
Selective law enforcement occurs in two steps. First an officer engages in what is known as “profiling”. The officer has a predetermined set of characteristics in mind, more likely than not to be consistent with a criminal persona. Now officers search for particular suspects, possessing particular physical features, pursuant to allegations of a specific crime routinely. This, after all, is bread and butter police work. Profiling, however, does not occur in response to a specific crime. In his or her mind, the officer carries a picture or profile of what a person, likely to be a criminal, looks like. The second phase occurred in the application of the profile on the streets in communities and on highways.
Two additional problems conspire to close the loop on this bellicose policy and, at the same time, doom an incalculable number of otherwise innocents to confront the terror of what can, for the most part, only be deemed unlawful searches and seizures. First the profiles developed by police officers and their departments, are essentially based upon anecdotal information, wrapped in the clothe of pseudo science and dubious statistical analysis. The second is that because none of us view ourselves as members, via the immutable characteristics of birth, of a class of persons whose profile is that of a criminal, those of us who then develop the profiles are significantly more likely to include those most unlike ourselves in such profiles. Thus, when the profilers are overwhelmingly white, those profiled become overwhelmingly non-white.
Notwithstanding disclaimers to the contrary, selective law enforcement remains an active part of the police arsenal. Those of us who continue to be profiled, demand that it be brought to an end.  see:  

These and other reasons are why we should appoint, elect more African American Judges to our courts.  951 452-9160  

Enter subhead content here

Occupy California Judicial

Author/ Warren Adams

    Quote by Forensic Anthropologist Clyde C. Snow 

Regarding Abuse of Police Powers:

Of all the forms of murder, none is more monstrous than that committed by a state against its own citizens. And of all murder victims, those of the state are the most helpless and vulnerable since the very entity to which they have entrusted their lives and safety becomes their killer. Thus, it is especially important that states be called to account for their deeds.

We might also say that crimes of any type committed by states, enforcement agencies, courts, business and industry, in particular lager corporations, religious organizations, this present administration serving a large segment of the population, receiving and being benefited by tax dollars, should be held equally accountable.
posted by:

Private Attorney General Act of 2004 | YOU ENFORCE THE LAW, see:

Court Actions - Schneider vs Ellis, see:

             IN OUR JUDICIAL SYSTEM, JUSTICE SHOULD NOT  BE “BLACK” or “WHITEAs a former law enforcement officer, I would expect the Judicial System to live up to and practice similar codes of ethics which I myself practiced, which are the following:                                 =Law Enforcement Code of Ethics= As a Law Enforcement Officer, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all men to:                          liberty,  equality  and  justice for ALL. (I assume it was meant for “BLACKS” also  )                                                                                                                                 I will keep my private life unsullied as an example to all; maintain courageous calm in the face of danger, scorn, or ridicule; develop self-restraint; and be constantly mindful of the welfare of others. Honest in thought and deed in both my personal and official life, I will be exemplary in obeying the laws of the land and regulations of my department. Whatever I see or hear of a confidential nature or that is confided to me in my official capacity will be kept ever secret unless revelation is necessary in the performance of my duty.                                  .I will never act officiously or permit personal feelings, prejudices, animosities or friendships to influence my decisions. With no compromise for crime and with relentless prosecution of criminals, I will enforce the law courteously and appropriately without fear or favor, malice or ill will, never employing unnecessary force or violence and never accepting gratuities………………………….I recognize the badge of my office as a symbol of public faith, and I accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am true to the ethics of the police service. I will constantly strive to achieve these objectives and ideals, dedicating myself before God to my chosen profession…law enforcement………………………………. …..                 Adopted 1956, The Peace Officers’ Association of the State of California  JUDICIAL RACISM IN CALIFORNIASunday, October 18, 2009Justice Department to Recharge Civil Rights Enforcement
WASHINGTON — Seven months after taking office,
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. is reshaping the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division by pushing it back into some of the most important areas of American political life, including voting rights, housing, employment, bank lending practices and restricting after the 2010 census.
As part of this shift, the Obama administration is planning a major revival of high-impact civil rights enforcement against policies, in areas ranging from ousing to hiring, where statistics show that minorities fare disproportionately poorly. President
George W. Bush’s appointees had discouraged such tactics, see: This system starts with "selective law enforcement", beginning with Police Officers, and upheld by the judicial system. This process continues through the court system, which is "pro-white" and "anti-Black".                                                                                                                                 Judge Willmon WCAB  see:  The biased treatment by Judge Chris Willmon indicates why in Riverside County there is NO--- The following recordings with Judges is an example of the judge’s beliefs.(Article 2007)

Judicial Racism No "Justice for Blacks"
The Civil Rights regulations and laws afforded Americans, should include African Americans. See: At a recent court hearing held by Judge Melanie Schodde.

               It should be noted that while Judge Frangie, who I consider “FAIR”, was                considering my case #906308 in San Bernardino Superior Civil Court in RM S-32,      Judge PACHECO, whom I had filed a 170.6, was meeting in secret in RM S-31   with Attorney David Binder for SCHNEIDER., see:  TENTATIVE RULINGS

The court rules as follows on the Motions of Defendant Walter Ellis for Judgment on the Pleadings of the Complaint and for a Stay of Proceedings:

Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings By Defendant Walter EllisThe motion is denied as to the First and Third Causes of Action. These causes of action are pleaded sufficiently. The Court cannot consider the "facts" or "evidence" Defendant seeks to show that are outside the face of the pleading in determining this motion.

The motion is granted as to the Second Cause of Action. The allegations are insufficient to establish that Defendant Ellis violated Business & Professions Code Section 12425 which requires that Ellis used Schneider's mark in connection with the sale, distribution, offering for sale, or advertising of goods or services.”

1.          “Code of Civil Procedures 425.16 & 425.16(f)2.         Judge Frangie took my requests under consideration.DENIAL DUE PROCESS:3.          CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS
Summary: Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights conspiracy statute. Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree together to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in any state, territory or district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the Unites States, (or because of his/her having exercised the same). Unlike most conspiracy statutes, Section 241 does not require that one of the conspirators commit an overt act prior to the
conspiracy becoming a crime. 

Before Judge Pacheco who had been denied to hear my case after my filing a timely 170.6 Motion.  See Motion To Stay  dated April 14, 2010:  Filed before Judge Frangie.

 Judge Frangie took my requests under consideration. Filed before Judge FrangieInlandPolitics.comBottom of Form

The PE: PACHECO LAWSUIT: Court says no standing to sue

Written by Administrator

Posted August 27, 2011 at 8:49 am


11:34 PM PDT on Friday, August 26, 2011


Complaints against Judge Pacheco



  ”No Proof of Service” (note most Orders issued by Judge PACHECO requested by SCHNEIDER are sent sometimes to the  wrong address,       proof of service not signed, and some with Judge Pacheco’s     stamp, with the appearance that SCHNEIDER may have their own stamp of the Judge’s.       A review of the Court Records will indicate numerous what appear    “FRAUDULANT” filings,  signatures and other discrepancies’.)…………………………     


                        SCHNEIDER COURT DOCUMENTS                                     Regarding SCHNEIDER 473(b) Appeal MotionAdditional complaints against Judge PACHECO:

 Judge John M. Pacheco is also being looked at for granting dad Alex Baeza unsupervised visitation with his 2-year-old son, despite credible evidence of child abuse. The little boy later died of a head injury 'allegedly' inflicted by his father. The father is facing homicide charges. Note that the mother was threatened with loss of custody for even mentioning her concerns."        "The family of a 2-year-old Inland boy who died in his father's care has filed a complaint asking that a San Bernardino County Superior Court judge be disbarred for granting visitation to the boy's father. Seven months after the judge's order, in which court records show he chastised the mother for overreacting to injuries, Isaac Gallegos was dead and his Moreno Valley father was charged with murder... [Judge Pacheco told the mother] "I think you're overreacting all right? Now, if you continue to act this way... I'll have to take custody away from you and... I will give custody to the person that is most willing to cooperate with the other parent, and giving them custody OK?... Ontario family faults judge in toddler's killing

Gallegos said Baeza told her the boy likely suffered the injury in a fall.

Gallegos and her family contend the judge, San Bernardino Superior Court Judge John M. Pacheco, should be disbarred for the way he handled her case.

They've filed a formal complaint against the judge with the state Commission on Judicial Performance.

"The judge was very upset the minute he walked in the courtroom," said Mike Lester, Gallegos' father. "He was very arrogant, very God-like. ... He was very rude. He was very unprofessional, in my opinion."

Pacheco could not be reached for comment. A staff member in his courtroom referred a media inquiry to San Bernardino County Presiding Judge Douglas Elwell.

Elwell said court rules prohibit Pacheco from commenting on a matter related to an active criminal case. Elwell declined to offer any opinion about his colleague's handling of Gallegos' case.

"It would be completely inappropriate," he said.

Gallegos said she asked to see a judge after her son returned home from a visitation with a large bruise on his butt and scratches on his back.

She hoped to modify Baeza's visitation rights, which allowed him to take the boy two days a week.

During a Sept. 4 hearing, Baeza told the judge that Isaac hurt himself jumping into a spa. After hearing both sides, Pacheco said he felt "very confident" Baeza didn't hurt the boy.

When Gallegos told the judge she feared for her son, Pacheco - a 2001 Gov. Gray Davis appointee - told her he believed she was overreacting.

"Now, if you continue to act this way, what I have to do is I'll have to take custody away from you and let - because I will give custody to the person that is most willing to cooperate with the other parent, and giving them custody, OK?" Pacheco said.

Because of the judge's remark, Gallegos said she was afraid to return to court when her son was injured two more times during visits with Baeza Both times her son's ears were bruised and appeared to have been pulled, she said.

"I was terrified to go back," Gallegos said.

Gallegos and her parents said they want to file a lawsuit against Pacheco, San Bernardino County and possibly others for Isaac's death. They say their motivation in doing so wouldn't be financial gain.

"It would be to protect other children," Gallegos said.

 see: COMPLAINTS filed with FMSCA (DOT) against SCHNEIDER


Recent Law Suits and Complaints Against Large Trucking Companies, see:

Private Attorney General Act of 2004   YOU ENFORCE THE LAW, see:

Court Actions - Schneider vs Ellis, see,

Workman Comp Complaint. see:


Congress, the MEDIA nor Government Agencies are concerned when African Americans are the victims

Your Agency is operating under the guidelines of Federal Regulations of Affirmative Action and Civil rights legislation under the Department of Justice.  When regulations mandated by the Department of Justice are enforced, they will contribute to an improvement in the “STATE of AMERICA”.

UAAD has been instrumental in filing numerous Civil rights and Human rights complaints with Federal and State Agencies since the mid 80's. These complaints are “always” ignored when African Americans are the victims.

After receiving a mailed citation showing a picture of a lady stated to be my wife running a red light in the city of San Diego, California, and realizing that it could not have been her driving the vehicle, I began protesting the citation on her behalf.  (see the following): 

 November 20, 2007Honorable Janis L. SammartinoRE: Citation A63682A Dear Sir or Madam,I have asked that the charges regarding this citation be dismissed in the interest of justice.I have appeared in court before a judge pro-tem and asked that a Judge hear my case, as I understand that I have the right under the law. Due to the fact that I am an out of state citizen, and I travel frequently with my husband who is a truck driver , I have asked and again ask for trial by written declaration, form TR-205 enclosed.Your court has ignored previous written request sent by registered mail since September 18, 2007. As I stated to Judge pro-tem Riley on 10/16/07 I would not give up my right to a speedy trial. My written statements to the court also indicate that I do not have and can’t perceive having monies for bail or find due to my limited retirement income. I have also asked, and asked again that the court fully explain:My right to a speedy trial.  After appearing on 10/16/07 and asking for trial by written declaration since September 18, 2007 when does my right to a speedy trial begin?After asking that a Judge rather than a Commissioner hear my case, why am I now being asked to appear before this same Commissioner that I thought I had the right to dismiss for prejudice? I am not guilty of the violation I have been charged, and I ask in the interest of justice that the charges be dismissed with an explanation of my rights to a speedy trial and the procedures to dismiss a Judge. In my opinion I believe these procedures should be spelled out clearly and concisely by the court and on the citations and notices to appear in court no matter the offense. These notices should be clearly spelled out whether it pertains to felonies, misdemeanors, traffic or infractions.The hidden procedures and the lack of the court to explain the rights and procedures to a lay person as myself, makes it difficult to receive a fair hearing in this and other courts, especially minorities.See:

Due to the distance to the court, and the lack of transportation and funds, we asked that this case be heard by Letters of Declaration, a process that is available to Caucasians only apparently.  The court in our case state that a $600 plus bond (fine) have to be posted in order to qualify for a Letter of Declaration appearance.  This demand of posting a bond was demanded after I and my wife appeared in person on the date stated in the citation.  After an appearance in court all Caucasians I have been in court with are not demanded to post bonds after such an appearance.

My question to the Judicial System is, How can an African American be awarded “DUE PROCESS” when the same procedures are not followed that are granted to others?

We ask and demand that these questions be answered in writing, and demand that the citation be dismissed or delayed until we can receive a reasonable answer.


This country’s HUMAN RIGHTS violation is worse than the Rights this administration is accusing CHINA and other countries of committing.

These conditions exist due to Federal and State agencies conspiring with companies in violating Civil Rights laws and regulations.  It is very difficult for an agency such as the FBI to enforce regulations that they themselves do not believe in and seldom enforce, unless the injured party is a White female as practiced under the so-called “Affirmative Action” legislation put in place and implemented to dilute Civil Rights legislation in order that White Females and White Males would be the beneficiaries.  

Courts, Government and Law Enforcement Agencies fail to act when        African Americans are concerned see: , The Feds Regulate and Collaborate with Banks  VS CENTRAL REFRIGERATED SERVICE CRS’s   WRONGFUL  TERMANITION  of  “BLACKS” UTAH   ATTORNEY GENERAL COMPLAINT /

Congress, the MEDIA nor Government Agencies are concerned when African Americans are the victims

DUE PROCESS for BLACKS, SAN DIEGO COURTS     see:       Walter L. Ellis, CEO UAAD                    



I agree with 0CCUPY WALL STREET, especially  CEO’S the likes of Jamie Dimon    JPMORGAN/CHASE BANK, see:   &  the our Nation's TRUCKERS need for your help, see: 
If our Nation's Banks would adhere to COMMUNITY RE-INVESTMENT ACT, OF 1977 CRA, the 99% would be much better off. Thanks for all you are doing. Walter Ellis  951 452-9160  January 1, 2012 

Enter content here

Enter supporting content here